The forced marriage of in particular catholic priests in senior positions, who have become fathers, to women other than the mother of the child, is a at first seemingly bizarre, but within the malicious and distorted logic of the church quite conclusive method, to keep the priest’s real family separated from him, to deny the child and the mother child support and inheritance, and to also emotionally wound them.
The ex-Priests “wife” is apparently always widowed or divorced, has several children of her own that are already older, and is in an age in which she herself cannot become pregnant again. The “marriages” are arranged in a way, that any money and any possessions belong to the “wife”, who also retains anything the ex- priests potentially earns, in order to make it maximally impossible to the child and the mother to receive anything, or to even just get in contact with the father, while the order or diocese officially don’t know of anything, and can on demand always pretend not to be involved, as the Priests has “left the priesthood”.
As the child and it’s mother will, if they overcome their first shock about the strange disappearance of the father, be too busy making ends meet, or just surviving, and as they probably also will doubt their own perception of the father, they will not have the strength to go to the public, or even detailed analyse what has happened. This enables the church to reach its primary goals: keeping secret that a senior catholic priest has a child of his own, and/or obscures the fact that it is the church that demands of him not to support the child. This construct of a marriage, with a woman who will permanently remind her “husband” that everything belongs to her, however, also very much increases the chance to meet the perverted church rule (introduced at the council of Pavia 1022) that children of priests must never receive or inherit anything from their fathers. Sadly, the church’s pervert wish to “punish” and “wound” the child and its mother, also seems to be a reason for the “forced marriage”.
The mother of the child in particular, will suffer much more from the sudden appearance of another woman, than she would have if the father has just returned to the church. The former priest in turn, will show his renewed submission by obeying the churches order not to support his own child, accepts the “punishment” for the child’s birth, and will never again speak critically about the church. We have for a long time confronted the order of the Jesuits with the analyses of the forced marriage, which the order never denied, and we also know about two cases in Germany in which the method seems to have been used.
David Weber (born 1975) is the son of Francis Peter Kelly, former provincial of the Australian Jesuits (in office 1968-1973) and Wiltrud Weber. Kelly takes a sabbatical year in 1973, and, in France, meets Wiltrud Weber, with whom he lives in a permanent relationship for the following two years. During this period, they have long discussions about Kelly’s possible resignation from the order, and also particularly Kelly’s doubts about the church’s teachings. Kelly is also working on the script of a book, of which he thinks that it will “upset Rome very much”. 1975, in the months before and after David Weber’s birth in November, Kelly disappears. In 1976, Wiltrud Weber suddenly receives a letter from him, in which he declares that he is now “married” to Carmel Eire (an elderly widow with four children of her own) and that he has “no own money”.
In one of the few open discussion his son will later be able to have with him, he states not to have known Carmel Eire until a few days before the “wedding”. In 1978 he self-publishes a very obedient, submissive book, without any critical word about the Catholic Church. In 1979, together with his acknowledgement of paternity that he obviously doesn’t tell the order about, he sends Wiltrud Weber a small sum of money, after that there is no contact until 1989. Several attempts from 1989 onward, to invite the son to Australia to go to school there, are thwarted in the last minute; Kelly is being given a secret telephone number. During the son’s visits to Australia in 1994 and 1995, for which Wiltrud and David Weber go into debt, the son is confronted with a brain-washed father, and cannot speak with him openly. Kelly dies in 2004, the funeral mass is concelebrated by five Jesuits, his son receives no inheritance.